Global Strategy tripod

Strengths of considering influences of the state and society in crafting strategy for foreign market entry There are various strengths that are related to considering influences of the state and society in crafting strategy for foreign market entry. In view of this, Peng (358) believed that the state and the society are entities in the environment that are concerned with crafting policies govern all players in their jurisdiction. Therefore, it is beneficial that these policies are considered by foreign market entrants in order to avoid penalties emanating from them.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Global Strategy tripod specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More In addition, according to Peng (49), it is beneficial for a firm since societies and states differ from one environment to another. Peng goes ahead and alludes that low income consumers in these societies are usually price sensitive. For that case it is beneficial for organizations to formulate its strategies with this in mind since it must forge good competitive strategies. Strengths of considering influences of the state and society in crafting strategy of corporate social responsibility On the other hand, there are various strengths of considering influences of the state and society in crafting strategy of corporate social responsibility. According to Peng (354), this is the case since strategy formulation prioritizes corporate social responsibility whereby issues that goes beyond economic, legal and technical requirements of the organization are factored in so as to achieve economic gains that the organization seeks. Moreover, this is so since the state and the society are the major determinants of how businesses are conducted in the environment. In relation to this, Peng (359) provides an example of the major three car manufacturers in the US which lobbied politician to change climatic policies. This resulted to increase in rivalries whi ch in turn became difficult for the companies to conduct their businesses. Therefore, it is imperative that firms should consider the impacts of state and society when crafting strategy of corporate social responsibility. This so since whatever measure that is taken by the state or the society might be disastrous or be beneficial to their strategies. Weaknesses of considering influences of the state and society in crafting strategy for foreign market entry However, there are various weaknesses of considering influences of the state and the society in crafting strategy for foreign market entry. For instance, these firms are considered by the same state and society as outsiders in their business environment. Moreover, in most cases, these firms also have limited control of the infrastructure.Advertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Weaknesses of considering influences of the state and society in crafting strategy of corporate social responsibility Nonetheless, despite having various strengths of considering state and society in crafting strategy of corporate social responsibility, there are various weaknesses that are associated with this approach. According to Peng (194), one of the drawbacks is that the state and society usually require their collaboration with local partners who may turn out to be of mismatch. When this happens, it becomes economically expensive for their businesses. Lastly, Peng (371) opines that in the event when a firm’s economic status may not allow for corporate social responsibility engagement, it is usually criticized by both the state and the society. As a result, it impact negatively on their cordial relationship. Conclusion In conclusion, according to Peng (368), firms are tasked with the need of coming up with proactive, reactive, accommodative and defensive strategies in order to meaningfully operate in a competitive enviro nment. For that case, institution based view to the formulation and implementation of a firm’s own global strategy have potential contributions that caters for forces affecting the firm in its business environment. This approach makes it to be proactive and reactive to all issues emanating from the operating environment. Works Cited Peng, Mike. Global Strategy, USA: South-Western Cengage Learning, 2009. Print. This essay on Global Strategy tripod was written and submitted by user Kyla Burt to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Free Essays on Mitchell Difficulty Paper

Difficulty Paper – Mitchell After reading W.J.T. Mitchell’s essay, The Photographic Essay: Four Case Studies, I found many ideas difficult to understand. The essay revolved around how photographs can be presented with and without an accompanying text and how these two rudiments relate to each other. Throughout the text, Mitchell is trying to show that â€Å"photography is and is not a language, and that retrospectively, language is and is not photography† (Mitchell 522). The entire understanding of a photograph and its accompanying text is a difficult relationship to understand. The relationship is described as â€Å"a principal site of struggle for value and power in contemporary representations of reality† (Mitchell 522). Mitchell uses multiple quotations to try to back up his point. He also uses difficult language throughout the essay. With a combination of a difficult topic, multiple quotations, and difficult language, I found this essay difficult to read. The entire topic of photographs and its relation to text is a difficult undertaking. Mitchell assumed that we as the reader understood the components of art in photography. By not explaining this, the reader has no understanding of photography or any of the elements about it. Mitchell’s explanation of the relationship between photographs and text completely lost the reader. Another area for concern with Mitchell’s essay is that he talks about four very different essays, but does not prove a point. All he does is give a basic summary of what was stated. By not explaining the importance of the different ideas from each essay, the reader has no point in knowing about each of these independent essays. Mitchell wrote his essay based on four other essays, but did not clearly give a good enough background for the reader to form their own conclusion. Mitchell leaves much of the understanding of this topic to personal interpretation, which is impossible to do witho... Free Essays on Mitchell Difficulty Paper Free Essays on Mitchell Difficulty Paper Difficulty Paper – Mitchell After reading W.J.T. Mitchell’s essay, The Photographic Essay: Four Case Studies, I found many ideas difficult to understand. The essay revolved around how photographs can be presented with and without an accompanying text and how these two rudiments relate to each other. Throughout the text, Mitchell is trying to show that â€Å"photography is and is not a language, and that retrospectively, language is and is not photography† (Mitchell 522). The entire understanding of a photograph and its accompanying text is a difficult relationship to understand. The relationship is described as â€Å"a principal site of struggle for value and power in contemporary representations of reality† (Mitchell 522). Mitchell uses multiple quotations to try to back up his point. He also uses difficult language throughout the essay. With a combination of a difficult topic, multiple quotations, and difficult language, I found this essay difficult to read. The entire topic of photographs and its relation to text is a difficult undertaking. Mitchell assumed that we as the reader understood the components of art in photography. By not explaining this, the reader has no understanding of photography or any of the elements about it. Mitchell’s explanation of the relationship between photographs and text completely lost the reader. Another area for concern with Mitchell’s essay is that he talks about four very different essays, but does not prove a point. All he does is give a basic summary of what was stated. By not explaining the importance of the different ideas from each essay, the reader has no point in knowing about each of these independent essays. Mitchell wrote his essay based on four other essays, but did not clearly give a good enough background for the reader to form their own conclusion. Mitchell leaves much of the understanding of this topic to personal interpretation, which is impossible to do witho...